Re: msys inet_pton strangeness
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: msys inet_pton strangeness |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4033d12c-2d82-470e-ab8c-3ab2f42985bb@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: msys inet_pton strangeness (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: msys inet_pton strangeness
Re: msys inet_pton strangeness |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-09-28 Sa 11:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:It's complaining like this:C:/tools/xmsys64/home/pgrunner/bf/root/REL_15_STABLE/pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure-common.c:219:21: error: implicit declaration of function 'inet_pton'; did you mean 'inet_aton'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 219 | if (inet_pton(AF_INET6, host, &addr) == 1) | ^~~~~~~~~configure has determined that we have inet_pton, and I have repeated the test manually.configure's test is purely a linker test. It does not check to see where/whether the function is declared. Meanwhile, the compiler is complaining that it doesn't see a declaration. So the problem probably can be fixed by adding an #include, but you'll need to figure out what. I see that our other user of inet_pton, fe-secure-openssl.c, has a rather different #include setup than fe-secure-common.c; does it compile OK?
I'll try, but this error occurs before we get that far.
We should have included ws2tcpip.h, which includes this:
#define InetPtonA inet_pton WINSOCK_API_LINKAGE INT WSAAPI InetPtonA(INT Family, LPCSTR pStringBuf, PVOID pAddr);
It's conditioned on (_WIN32_WINNT >= 0x0600), but that should be true.
So I'm still very confused ;-(
cheers
andrew
-- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: