Re: View definition changes after reloading pg_dump export
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: View definition changes after reloading pg_dump export |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 402822.1662041327@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | View definition changes after reloading pg_dump export (Wesley Schwengle <wesley.schwengle@xxllnc.nl>) |
| Ответы |
Re: View definition changes after reloading pg_dump export
Re: View definition changes after reloading pg_dump export |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Wesley Schwengle <wesley.schwengle@xxllnc.nl> writes:
> There is a view that we create and it uses a function and the view
> definition changes between runs. I'm not sure why this is happening,
> does someone know?
The core reason for the discrepancy is that the parser inserts
implicit coercion steps into your initial, not-very-consistently-typed
query; but the view-dumping logic (ruleutils.c) tends to display
those steps as explicit coercions. Formally speaking it shouldn't
do that, because the parser may act differently depending on whether
a cast is explicitly present, as indeed you see here. But if we don't
write the coercions explicitly then there is a risk of the reloaded view
being interpreted differently than it was before (perhaps because there
are more or different overloaded functions/operators available at reload
time). So the dumping logic is kind of between a rock and a hard place.
Our experience has been that printing the coercions explicitly causes
fewer problems than not doing so, so that's what it does.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: