Re: [PATCH] untrusted plperl

Alex Pilosov <alex@pilosoft.com> writes:
> Hope someone finds that useful and maybe even merged :)

It looks great to me (except you forgot the documentation updates ;)).
But it'd be nice to get a Perl expert to comment on the thing,
particularly on the safe/unsafe-in-one-interpreter business.

One thought that comes to mind: seems like it'd be possible to
communicate via Perl global variables, functions, etc between
safe and unsafe functions.  This might be good, or it might be
a vehicle for bypassing the safety restrictions.  We should
think hard about that.
        regards, tom lane