Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Дата
Msg-id 4011657B.2090501@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Ответы Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64  (Christopher Weimann <cweimann@k12hq.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
>>XFS.. hands down.
>>
>>
>
>I thought it was you who recently said you thought there was some
>sort of possible caching problem there?
>
>
>
Not I. We have had issues with JFS and data corruption on a powerout but
XFS has been rock solid in all of our tests.

XFS also has the interesting ability (although I have yet to test it)
that will allow you
to take a snapshot of the filesystem. Thus you can have filesystem level
backups
of the PGDATA directory that are consistent even though the database is
running.
There is nothing else on Linux that comes close to that. Plus XFS has been
proven in a 64 bit environment (Irix).

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake




>A
>
>
>


--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-667-4564 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
Mammoth PostgreSQL Replicator. Integrated Replication for PostgreSQL


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Sullivan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: High Performance/High Reliability File system on SuSE64
Следующее
От: Orion Henry
Дата:
Сообщение: help with dual indexing