> Any opinions which to do, or alternate proposals? I'm leaning
> slightly to #2, since I doubt anyone is trying to use "IN" as
> a function name, but ...
One addition. The information_schema.parameters view will need to be
updated to reflect parameter names.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/static/infoschema-parameters.html
Quote: "Always null, since PostgreSQL does not support named parameters"
Chris