nextval() is the solution to your problems. currval() won't help, all
users will get same previous value.
At 05:15 7.9.2000 , Mark Dzmura wrote:
>Peter:
>
>Trying to solve my problem mentioned in the email of half an hour ago, I
>searched
>through the archives of the interface list and found some of your replies
>suggesting
>using "currval()" to get the last value assigned from a sequence... However,
>here's what happens in a good database with multiple in-use sequences:
>
>db=# select currval('foo_foo_id_seq');
>ERROR: foo_foo_id_seq.currval is not yet defined in this session
>
>As an alternative, I discovered that I can get the value this way:
>
>db=# select last_value from foo_foo_id_seq;
>last_value
>---------
> 27
>
>My questions are, (1) why does the currval() approach give the error
>message, and
>(2) is it OK to use my alternative??
>
>Finally, as far as I can tell, there is a real race condition problem here
>in a multiple-connection
>scenario (e.g. another task can cause the sequence to be incremented between
>the insert
>and the select) - but wrapping a transaction around the insert and select
>should
>take care of it... Thoughts??
>
>Thanks,
>Mark Dzmura
>
>