Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Дата
Msg-id 3f8310ef-5677-dd52-235e-655ede43c604@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On 11/18/16 12:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> My feeling is that 82233ce7e has obsoleted all of the proposals made so
> far in this thread, and that we should reject them all.

Yes, it seems that very similar concerns were already addressed there.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take