Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Дата
Msg-id 3f342a03-3252-03e7-47ad-9d5d6c3dc22d@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 1/13/17 10:18 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> The point I was making was that serious montioring systems would have to
> be changed and I stand by that.

I don't think my monitoring systems are any less serious than yours.

> Certainly, check_postgres is going to have to be changed to address this
> and, unsurprisingly, it's already had to address a variety of major
> version differences that have been introduced over the years.

check_postgres will not need to be changed except for the actions that
check the disk, which you don't need unless you are using archiving.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Clarifying "server starting" messaging in pg_ctlstart without --wait
Следующее
От: Antonin Houska
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PoC: Grouped base relation