On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> Simon Riggs wrote:
>>>> Do we need a new record type for that, is there a handy record type to
>>>> bounce from?
>>
>>> After starting streaming, slices of WAL are sent as CopyData messages.
>>> The CopyData payload begins with an XLogRecPtr, followed by the WAL
>>> data. That payload format needs to be extended with a 'message type'
>>> field and a new message type for the timestamps need to be added.
>>
>> Whether or not anyone bothers with the timestamp message, I think adding
>> a message type header is a Must Fix item. A protocol with no provision
>> for extension is certainly going to bite us in the rear before long.
>
> Agreed a message type header is a good idea, although we don't expect
> streaming replication and the protocol to work across different major
> versions anyway.
The attached patch adds a message type header into the payload in
CopyData message sent from walsender to walreceiver, to make the
replication protocol more extensible.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center