Hi,
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
> The second question is, is it worth doing this so extremely late in the
> 8.4 development? After mentioning it quickly in an offlist discussion
> with Heikki, I think our conclusion was that we should wait with this
> until the tree opens for 8.5.
That's OK. I'll wait for 8.5.
> It's not a very likely scenario that
> anybody actually has pg_standby on a machine that doesn't have libpq on
> it - since it needs to have a PostgreSQL server on it to make any sense....
My first concern was whether the latest pg_standby can work with old postgres
(old libpq.so).
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center