Re: Hot standby, recovery infra
| От | Fujii Masao |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3f0b79eb0902261132i7c62c6dbw211fe6964139c69e@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> I think the real problem here is that pg_standby traps SIGQUIT. The startup
> process doesn't receive the SIGQUIT because it's in system(), and pg_standby
> doesn't propagate it to the startup process either because it traps it.
Yes, you are right.
> I think we should simply remove the signal handler for SIGQUIT from
> pg_standby.
+1
> I don't see how that helps, as we already have this in there:
>
> signaled = WIFSIGNALED(rc) || WEXITSTATUS(rc) > 125;
>
> ereport(signaled ? FATAL : DEBUG2,
> (errmsg("could not restore file \"%s\" from archive: return code %d",
> xlogfname, rc)));
>
> which means we already ereport(FATAL) if the restore command dies with SIGQUIT.
SIGQUIT should kill the process immediately, so I think that the startup
process as well as other auxiliary process should call exit(2) instead of
ereport(FATAL). Right?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: