Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3eb194cf-b878-1f63-8623-6d6add0ed0b7@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress (Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Reporting script runtimes in pg_regress
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2019-02-21 10:37, Christoph Berg wrote:
> diff --git a/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c b/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c
> index a18a6f6c45..8080626e94 100644
> --- a/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c
> +++ b/src/test/regress/pg_regress.c
> @@ -1794,12 +1794,14 @@ run_schedule(const char *schedule, test_function tfunc)
> else
> {
> status(_("FAILED"));
> + status(" "); /* align with failed (ignored) */
> fail_count++;
> }
So an issue here is that in theory "FAILED" etc. are marked for
translation but your spacers do not take that into account. Personally,
I have no ambition to translate pg_regress, so we could remove all that.
But it should be done consistently in either case.
I also think we shouldn't worry about the "failed (ignored)" case. That
never happens, and I don't want to mess up the spacing we have now for
that. I'd consider removing support for it altogether.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: