Re: Possible mistake in backup documentation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Laurenz Albe
Тема Re: Possible mistake in backup documentation
Дата
Msg-id 3e33df71449fdc083b1ed8a4dfe3ee129de59798.camel@cybertec.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Possible mistake in backup documentation  (PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: Possible mistake in backup documentation
Список pgsql-docs
On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 14:17 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> In "25.3.3.2. Making An Exclusive Low-Level Backup", you said that "The
> exclusive backup method is deprecated and should be avoided. Prior to
> PostgreSQL 9.6, this was the only low-level method available, but it is now
> recommended that all users upgrade their scripts to use non-exclusive
> backups". But in the example in "25.3.6.1. Standalone Hot Backups" you use
> the exclusive version of backup command. Is it a mistake or not?

Yes, that's true.

How about the attached patch?

Perhaps that is too complicated, but I have no idea how to make it simpler.
Ceterum censeo, we should not deprecate the exclusive backup API.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

Вложения

В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Please provide examples of rows from
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Possible mistake in backup documentation