Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD
Дата
Msg-id 3e117f7388c26c11b05e642ed347ba533b456394.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [MASSMAIL]Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: Differential code coverage between 16 and HEAD  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2024-04-14 at 15:33 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> - Coverage for some of the new unicode code is pretty poor:
>  
> https://anarazel.de/postgres/cov/16-vs-HEAD-2024-04-14/src/common/unicode_category.c.gcov.html#L122

Thank you for looking. Those functions are tested by category_test.c
which is run with the 'update-unicode' target.

Better testing in the SQL tests might be good, but the existing tests
are near-exhaustive, so I'm not terribly worried. Also, it's possible
not all of them are reachable by SQL, yet, because some of the later
patches in the series didn't land in 17.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?
Следующее
От: Justin Pryzby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg17 issues with not-null contraints