Re: Log prefix missing for subscriber log messages received from publisher
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Log prefix missing for subscriber log messages received from publisher |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3dbe69f3-e1ce-442d-a978-dd016a38c592@oss.nttdata.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Log prefix missing for subscriber log messages received from publisher (vignesh C <vignesh21@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Log prefix missing for subscriber log messages received from publisher
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025/07/19 15:45, vignesh C wrote: >> Also, I don't see why there are three patches here instead of just one. > > Earlier we thought to commit replication changes function firstlly and > then commit dblink and fdw changes, but now that we are using a common > notice receiver function. I feel it can be a single patch. Yes, I initially suggested splitting the patches for that reason, but I agree it's better to merge them into a single patch now that we're using a shared custom notice receiver. > Merged the > patches. The attached v7 version patch has the changes for the same. Thanks for updating the patch! It looks good to me, except for one minor point: static inline PGresult *libpqsrv_get_result(PGconn *conn, uint32 wait_event_info); +static inline void libpqsrv_notice_receiver(void *arg, const PGresult *res); This prototype is only needed if the function is used earlier in libpq-be-fe-helpers.h, but that's not the case here, so I don't think it's necessary. Unless there are objections, I'll remove that prototype and commit the patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NTT DATA Japan Corporation
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: