Re: Some comments on PL/Python documentation

On 29.12.24 01:48, PG Doc comments form wrote:
> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/plpython-data.html
> Description:
> 
> Hello,
> In my opinion, some phrases on this page are not quite correct.
> 
> 44.2.4. Composite Types
> You say: '...Object (any object providing method __getattr__)...'
> Actually, the object class provides the __getattribute__() method but not
> the __getattr__() method.
> See https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#object.__getattr__

Yes, this looks slightly inaccurate.  I'm not sure __getattribute__ is 
fully correct either, because types can also implement other ways of 
returning attributes, especially if they are implemented in C.  Is there 
a neutral and accurate way to describe this?

> 44.2.5. Set-Returning Functions
> 1. You say: '...Sequence type (tuple, list, set)...'
> Being an unordered collection, sets do not record element position or order
> of insertion. Accordingly, sets do not support indexing, slicing, or other
> sequence-like behavior.
> See
> https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#set-types-set-frozenset

I think this is correct as it is.  Python sets can be iterated over, so 
this works.  Note that earlier in the page under composite types it says 
"but not a set because it is not indexable", so this distinction was 
taken into consideration.

> 2. You say: '...Iterator (any object providing __iter__ and next
> methods)...'
> Actually, the iterator objects must support the __next__() method.
> See https://docs.python.org/3/glossary.html#term-iterator

Yes, this was recently fixed already and will appear in the next patch 
release.