Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3c0f5c31-9a89-42ba-a53d-9d9148885297@eisentraut.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ) (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: SQL Property Graph Queries (SQL/PGQ)
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 02.12.25 11:00, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: >> When you create future patches, consider using the git format-patch -v >> option. >> > I am still using timestamp as a version but passing it to -v instead > of treating it as a suffix. I like datestamp as versionstamp for the > reasons mentioned upthread. Date stamps are great, but why is there a hyphen between the "v" and the number? I have committed the parse.pl patch, mainly to test it out so that we don't have surprises later. (I had problems in the past making it work with older Perl versions, but things seems to have shifted forward now.) It can live on its own, I think. It looks like undirected matching -[ ]- (without arrows) doesn't work correctly. It seems to just match in one direction. I don't see any tests. Is this implemented? Also, make sure the role names in graph_table_rls.sql start with regress_: CREATE USER graph_rls_alice NOLOGIN; +WARNING: roles created by regression test cases should have names starting with "regress_" (This is the FreeBSD CI failure.)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: