On 7/31/19 11:31 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org> writes:
>> On 7/30/19 7:43 PM, Nasby, Jim wrote:
>>> My concern about calling this -extensions is that it’s really meant for people that are at least at the level of C
extensions(and probably only those making use of hooks). That’s a relatively small number of extensions, even if they
aresome of the most important extensions.
>
>> Well, that may become self-evident based on the discussions on the
>> -extensions mailing list ;)
>
> Yeah, but "-forks" doesn't seem to capture the proposed discussion
> space very well either. I also dislike that name because it seems to
> be encouraging people to use community resources to discuss projects
> that are, um, not exactly well connected to the community.
> "-extensions" seems better from that standpoint.
>
> Somebody previously suggested "pgsql-extension-hackers", which is a
> bit long but might help to push the technical content towards the
> level Jim is hoping for.
+1 for -extension-hackers as an alternative.
Jonathan