Imai-san,
On 2019/03/20 17:36, Imai, Yoshikazu wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:21 AM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2019/03/20 12:15, Imai, Yoshikazu wrote:
>>> [select1024.sql]
>>> \set a random (1, 1024)
>>> select * from rt where a = :a;
>>>
>>> [pgbench]
>>> pgbench -n -f select1024.sql -T 60
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Could you please try with running pgbench for a bit longer than 60 seconds?
>
> I run pgbench for 180 seconds but there are still difference.
Thank you very much.
> 1024: 7,004 TPS
> 8192: 5,859 TPS
>
>
> I also tested for another number of partitions by running pgbench for 60 seconds.
>
> num of part TPS
> ----------- -----
> 128 7,579
> 256 7,528
> 512 7,512
> 1024 7,257 (7274, 7246, 7252)
> 2048 6,718 (6627, 6780, 6747)
> 4096 6,472 (6434, 6565, 6416) (quoted from above (3)'s results)
> 8192 6,008 (6018, 5999, 6007)
>
>
> I checked whether there are the process which go through the number of partitions, but I couldn't find. I'm really
wonderingwhy this degradation happens.
Indeed, it's quite puzzling why. Will look into this.
Thanks,
Amit