Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
От | Andrei Lepikhov |
---|---|
Тема | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3ac7c436-81e1-4191-9caf-b0dd70b51511@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes (Pavel Borisov <pashkin.elfe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Playing with the feature, I found a slightly irritating permutation - even if this code doesn't group any clauses, it may permute positions of the quals. See: DROP TABLE IF EXISTS main_tbl; CREATE TABLE main_tbl(id bigint, hundred int, thousand int); CREATE INDEX mt_hundred_ix ON main_tbl(hundred); CREATE INDEX mt_thousand_ix ON main_tbl(thousand); VACUUM (ANALYZE) main_tbl; SET enable_seqscan = off; EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT m.id, m.hundred, m.thousand FROM main_tbl m WHERE (m.hundred < 2 OR m.thousand < 3); Bitmap Heap Scan on public.main_tbl m Output: id, hundred, thousand Recheck Cond: ((m.thousand < 3) OR (m.hundred < 2)) -> BitmapOr -> Bitmap Index Scan on mt_thousand_ix Index Cond: (m.thousand < 3) -> Bitmap Index Scan on mt_hundred_ix Index Cond: (m.hundred < 2) Conditions on the columns "thousand" and "hundred" changed their places according to the initial positions defined in the user's SQL. It isn't okay. I see that users often use the trick of "OR order" to avoid unnecessary calculations - most frequently, Subplan evaluations. So, it makes sense to fix. In the attachment, I have included a quick fix for this issue. Although many tests returned to their initial (pre-18) state, I added some tests specifically related to this issue to make it clearer. -- regards, Andrei Lepikhov
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: