Re: why the need for is null?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mark Kirkwood
Тема Re: why the need for is null?
Дата
Msg-id 3FF4A627.5040500@paradise.net.nz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на why the need for is null?  (Baldur Norddahl <bbn-pgsql.general@clansoft.dk>)
Ответы Re: why the need for is null?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
The relational model was designed using a 3 valued logic - true, false,null.

All relational database implementations will inflict this on you :-)

Not everyone is convinced that the 3 valued approach was the best way.
For some entertaining comments by Chris Date and Fabian Pascal see:

http://www.dbdebunk.citymax.com/page/page/622689.htm

best wishes

Mark

Baldur Norddahl wrote:

>Hi,
>
>How come "X=null" is not the same as "X is null"? I got a few selects with
>queries like this:
>
>
>


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Baldur Norddahl
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why the need for is null?
Следующее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: why the need for is null?