Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Olivier Hubaut
Тема Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax?
Дата
Msg-id 3FD6ECC3.6070403@scmbb.ulb.ac.be
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax?  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
Список pgsql-jdbc
Kris Jurka wrote:

>
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Olivier Hubaut wrote:
>
>
>>I'm trying to do a create function using JDBC 3,0 in Eclipse IDE with
>>JFaceDBC plugin.
>
>
> I don't know the JFaceDBC plugin does, but it seems like the @user_schema@
> and what not indicate a replacement scheme.  Is it possible that it also
> alters the function body somehow?
>
> I don't think this is a backend or JDBC problem.  If you think otherwise a
> more complete example that can be run without Eclipse will be necessary.
>
> Kris Jurka
>
>
>
Thanks for your fast response.

The @user_schema@ and other similar pattern are just ANT's variables
used to create the functions on demand. The real query contains the réal
schema name and function name, and this one doesn't work.

I've already tried to make some other multiple queries, without any
problems. There is only with the CREATE FUNCTION that this bug appear.

I don't Think JFaceDBC is the cause, it's only a quite simple editor to
write queries with colorization, noting else.

--
Ci-git une signature avortee.
** RIP **

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kris Jurka
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug in JDBC CREATE FUNCTION syntax?
Следующее
От: "Alexey Yudichev"
Дата:
Сообщение: OID, compatible=7.1 and getBinaryStream() in 7.4 driver + 7.4 database