Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 01:27:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> > Tom Lane wrote:
>> >> I've been able to reproduce this on one of my machines, and it's nasty.
>>
>> > In that case I'm confused about why this code compiles on my machine:
>>
>> What compiler are you using? I'm using gcc 2.95.3 (on the machine that
>> shows the failure)
>
> I can compile current cvs with gcc 2.95.3, openssl 0.9.7b and
> zlib 1.2.1.
>
> zlib 1.2.1 still has the same typedef though.
compile success with gcc 2.96 here.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #