Re: Problem with dblink

Tom Lane wrote:
> Yeah, I think to apply it to a stable branch you'd want some indication
> that there are more live bugs out there that it's needed to catch.  At
> the moment it only seems called for as an aid to future development, and
> so HEAD seems sufficient.
>

Thanks, that's what i thought.

On a loosely related question, I didn't see commit messages for my
commits. Am I supposed to do something specific to cause them to be emitted?

Joe