Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Shridhar Daithankar writes:
>
>
>>So forming a new group is quite beneficial?
>
>
> No, we don't need one group, we need many individuals (or possibly small
> groups) to get in contact with their second favorite projects and hang out
> there.
I meant lets form a group within advocacy which would consult other projects.
Since we would expect people to encounter similar kind of problem, a group
within advocacy/general might be a good idea.
Of course we need not do anything special till we have sizable projets being
consulted. Can we at least have a web page for projects that use/prefer
postgresql. I think I put ahead such idea of cross linking earlier as well.
>>I think so too.. I have been planning to do that for dbmail and egroupware
>>but haven't got around it..
> When I said "I've been doing a bit of that", I meant "the developers of
> eGroupWare call me once a week with questions". So maybe you can take
> over dbmail. :-)
Sure. Check this.
-----------
Hello,
My name is <> and I work with postgresql group. Recently we/postgresql
advocay/general group have decided to form a group of people who would help
other projects w.r.t postgresql.
So feel free to ask me questions. I can help you to put yor questions to
appropriate forums/persons effectively.
Regards
-----------
Sounds good? Or too aggressive?
Bye Shridhar