scott.marlowe wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
>>The main problem with this is knowing which files need to be fsync'd.
>>
>>
>
>Wasn't this a problem that the win32 port had to solve by keeping a list
>of all files that need fsyncing since Windows doesn't do sync() in the
>classical sense? If so, then could we use that code to keep track of the
>files that need fsyncing?
>
>
>
according to the win32 page at
http://momjian.postgresql.org/main/writings/pgsql/win32.html this is
still to be done. I seem to recall Bruce saying that SRA had found the
solution to this, something along these lines, but I am not sure the
code is there yet (don't have access to that branch on this machine)
cheers
andrew