>Also, to be blunt: if pg_dump still has problems after all the years
>we've put into it, what makes you think that in-place upgrade will
>magically work reliably?
>
>
Fair enough. On another front then... would all this energy we are
talking about with pg_upgrade
be better spent on pg_dump/pg_dumpall/pg_restore?
>>This I am hoping
>>changes in 7.4 as we moved to a pure "c" implementation.
>>
>>
Your right that was a mistype. I was very tired and reading three
different threads at the same time.
Sincerely,
Joshua Drake
>Eh? AFAIR, pg_dump has always been in C.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc., home of Mammoth PostgreSQL - S/ODBC and S/JDBC
Postgresql support, programming shared hosting and dedicated hosting.
+1-503-222-2783 - jd@commandprompt.com - http://www.commandprompt.com
The most reliable support for the most reliable Open Source database.