Re: need for in-place upgrades (was Re: State of

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> It is alot but is is not a lot for something like an Insurance company
> or a bank. Also 100TB is probably non-compressed although 30TB is still
> large.

Our requirements are such that this figure is our best guess after
compression.  The amount of data prior to compression is much larger,
and consists of highly compressible astronomical observations in FITS
format.
--
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute