Re: Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2
| От | Jan Wieck |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3F57A842.6050904@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2 (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Stats Collector Error 7.4beta1 and 7.4beta2
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> It could be useful to have a warning at the following line:
>
> if (memcmp(&fromaddr, &pgStatAddr, fromlen))
> continue;
>
> That way you can rule out that that is a problem.
>
> Anyway, I still didn't see the error message he got in the first
> place. Maybe we're looking at the wrong thing?
I think it's more this piece of code in postmaster/pgstat.c
/* * The source address of the packet must be our own socket. * This ensures that only real
hackersor our own backends * tell us something. (This should be redundant with a * kernel-level check
dueto having used connect(), but let's * do it anyway.) */ if (memcmp(&fromaddr, &pgStatAddr,
fromlen)) continue;
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: