Re: bad estimates / non-scanning aggregates

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ken Geis
Тема Re: bad estimates / non-scanning aggregates
Дата
Msg-id 3F4EC1D0.5010503@speakeasy.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: bad estimates / non-scanning aggregates  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Ответы Re: bad estimates / non-scanning aggregates  (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>)
Список pgsql-performance
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>Not according to the optimizer!  Plus, this is not guaranteed to return
>>the correct results.
>
> For it to be fast you need an index on (stock_id, price_date) so that
> you can use an index scan.

I already said that such an index existed.  In fact, it is the primary
key of the table.  And yes, I *am* analyzed!

> The answers are guarenteed to be correct. See:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/sql-select.html#SQL-DISTINCT

That's good to know.  Thanks!


Ken



В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bad estimates / non-scanning aggregates
Следующее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: bad estimates / non-scanning aggregates