Re: Replication Ideas
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Replication Ideas |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F4DF7A1.21007.3477A6E@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Replication Ideas ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 26 Aug 2003 at 3:01, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com> writes: > > > Yes I have. Postgres-r is not a high-availability solution which is > > > capable of transparent failover, > > > > What makes you say that? My understanding is it's supposed to survive > > loss of individual servers. > > How does it play 'catch up' went a server comes back online? <dumb idea> PITR + archive logs daemon? Chances of a node and an archive log daemon going down simalrenously are pretty low. If archive log daemon works on another machin, the MTBF should be pretty acceptable.. </dumb idea> Bye Shridhar -- The Briggs-Chase Law of Program Development: To determine how long it will take to write and debug a program, take your best estimate, multiply that by two, add one, and convert to the next higher units.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: