Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results.
| От | Shridhar Daithankar |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3F4CA308.15268.327E2C9@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Sun vs a P2. Interesting results. (Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Sun vs a P2. Interesting results.
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On 26 Aug 2003 at 8:34, Jeff wrote: > Could it just be that the sun sucks? (And for the record - same schema, > nearly same query (modified for datetime syntax) on informix runs in 3 > seconds). My impression is IPC on sun has higher initial latency than linux. But given that you also ran the tests with multiple connections and results were of similar pattern, I can't help to conclude that postgresql has to find a way to have faste IPC on solaris. I know I will be flamed for repeatedly making this suggestion. But what does tests with sparc linux on same machine yield? Bye Shridhar -- untold wealth, n.: What you left out on April 15th.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: