Re: Buglist
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Buglist |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F452DB6.26979.1725DD7@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Buglist (Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>) |
Ответы |
Re: Buglist
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 21 Aug 2003 at 11:01, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 03:40:29PM +1000, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > > Given lazy vacuum doesn't hold locks for long periods, it could be > > an idea to continuously spend 1% of your disk bandwidth on a > > background vacuum. As for vacuum full, I don't know if you could do > > the same thing. > > Assuming that one can keep up with the dust bunnies this way, though, > one wouldn't need to do vacuum full. This would definitely be a way > cool feature, if implementable. If a database is clean i.e. no dead tuple, an autovacuum daemon with 1 min interval can achieve pretty much same result, isn't it? Bye Shridhar -- Drew's Law of Highway Biology: The first bug to hit a clean windshield lands directly in front of your eyes.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: