Re: Update of foreign key values

Yuup, always name constraints so it's easier to remove them. And if you name them meaningfully, then others might
understandwhy they exist! (or later after a coffeeless morning) 

Roderick A. Anderson wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
>
>
>>Yes. Either DEFERRABLE or INITIALLY DEFERRED must be given in order for
>>set constraints to be meaningful. This might be another good place to
>>consider a little clarification (or maybe a doc note in the interactive
>>docs)
>
>
> Phew.  I thought I was going bonkers.  Then add that I never named the
> constraints so I was still out'a luck.
>
>
> Rod