Re: Package naming conventions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andreas Pflug
Тема Re: Package naming conventions
Дата
Msg-id 3F33C474.7030506@pse-consulting.de
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Package naming conventions  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Список pgadmin-hackers
Dave Page wrote:

>
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Raphaël Enrici [mailto:blacknoz@club-internet.fr]
>>Sent: 08 August 2003 14:53
>>To: Dave Page
>>Cc: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org
>>Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Package naming conventions
>>
>>
>>
>>I Totally agree with Dave. But don't you think we could go
>>further ? As
>>you just renamed files, the informations concerning the packages are
>>still what they were when it was released :
>>for example :
>>
>>
>
>Urgh. didn't realise that info was in the RPMs. It's not in the Win32 or Slackware releases.
>
We can have verbose version information in win32 using VERSION
resources. This would be win32-best-practice. I'll have a look at it.

Regards,
Andreas


В списке pgadmin-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Raphaël Enrici
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Package naming conventions
Следующее
От: Andreas Pflug
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgAdmin3 help system