Re: Some vacuum & tuning help
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Some vacuum & tuning help |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F2FFFE1.6163.9BBBFB@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Some vacuum & tuning help (Jeff <threshar@torgo.978.org>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 5 Aug 2003 at 9:18, Jeff wrote: > As for the pg_dumping of it. I suppose it would work on this table as it > is only a couple million rows and not terribly big data-wise. The other > tables in this db are rather big and a load is not fast. (It is about > 8GB). You need to dump only those table which has unusualy high unused stats. If that is a small table, dump/reload it would be far faster than vacuum.. For others vacuum analyse should do.. > > You mean linux? I guess you need a kernel revision for a long time. How about > > 2.4.21? > > > Yeah, linux. We're planning on upgrading when we relocate datacenters at > the end of August. This machine has actually been up for 486 days (We're > hoping to reach linux's uptime wraparound of 496 days :) and the only > reason it went down then was because the power supply failed. (That can > be read: pg7.0.2 had over a year of uptime. lets hope 7.3 works as good :) Good to know that. AFAIK, the 496 wraparound is fixed in 2.6. So that won't be a complaint any longer.. Bye Shridhar -- Gravity: What you get when you eat too much and too fast.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: