Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua D. Drake
Тема Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial
Дата
Msg-id 3F2EC0B2.5090906@commandprompt.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Ответы Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial
Список pgsql-general
>
> Do we need official permission to call the language plPHP by the way?
> That's the only part of the PHP license I'm wondering about.


 From what I read:

Products derived from this software may not be called "PHP", nor
      may "PHP" appear in their name, without prior written permission
      from group@php.net.  You may indicate that your software works in
      conjunction with PHP by saying "Foo for PHP" instead of calling
      it "PHP Foo" or "phpfoo"


No. We don't need to do that. We couldn't call it PHP Procedural
Language but Procedural Language for PHP (plPHP) is ok.

Sincerely,

Joshua Drake



В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "scott.marlowe"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial
Следующее
От: Richard Welty
Дата:
Сообщение: varchar, text and cidr