Re: plPHP -- sort of an announcement.. but not commercial

scott.marlowe wrote:
>>10.Fix license
>
> Looking at the license for PHP found here:
>
> http://www.php.net/license/3_0.txt
>
> it would seem to be pretty much an apache style license that doesn't allow
> you to relicense it without permission.  but it looks BSD compatible.
>
>

The issue was that plPHP as posted was claimed to be GPL, although there
isn't any notice at all in the source that I saw.

Does the PHP license require programs that dynamically link carry their
license, similar to GPL (I didn't get that impression)? If not, then
something like PL/PHP should be licensable under BSD.

Joe