Re: concurrent writes
От
Shridhar Daithankar
Тема
Re: concurrent writes
Дата
Msg-id
3F269CE8.27725.52299C7@localhost
Ответ на
concurrent writes (Andreas Jung)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
concurrent writes Andreas Jung <andreas.jung@haufe.de>
Re: concurrent writes Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>
Re: concurrent writes Dennis Gearon <gearond@cvc.net>
Re: concurrent writes "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: concurrent writes Andreas Jung <andreas.jung@haufe.de>
Re: concurrent writes Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
Re: concurrent writes "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: concurrent writes Andreas Jung <andreas.jung@haufe.de>
Re: concurrent writes Andrew Sullivan <andrew@libertyrms.info>
Re: concurrent writes Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: concurrent writes "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: concurrent writes Andreas Jung <andreas.jung@haufe.de>
On 29 Jul 2003 at 12:33, Andreas Jung wrote: > we are running Postgres 7.3.3 successfully on our portal sites > under Solaris. For a new project we have the requirement that > N processes need to write update/insert within the same time and within > the same transaction data in one table. What does it mean by same transaction data? >More detailed: every process > opens its own connection, starts a transaction, updates *different* rows > and then commits. According to our postgres adminstrator, Postgres seems > to behave differently on Linux and Solaris. Any ideas on that? How it is different? It should be same, right? Bye Shridhar -- QOTD: "I may not be able to walk, but I drive from the sitting posistion."
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
