Re: CREATE TABLE with REFERENCE
| От | Dmitry Tkach |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: CREATE TABLE with REFERENCE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3F257DFD.4060808@openratings.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | CREATE TABLE with REFERENCE (kay-uwe.genz <kug1977@web.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: CREATE TABLE with REFERENCE
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Jonathan Bartlett wrote: >Why not just drop the "references" clause? I mean, the point of having >transactions is to guarantee integrity within a transaction, if you're not >going to have that, why even bother with the clause? > Quite the opposite - the point is to guaratee the integrity *outside* the transaction. You can set the constraints to be 'deferred', so that the referential integrity only gets verified at the time you commit your transaction- this way you can allow 'temporary' violations of the constraints inside your transactions, while still being guaranteed that all the data that actually gets committed satisfies all of your constraints. > >Most of my databases don't even user "references", just because I like the >flexibility, and I have multitable keys (keys that can refer to rows from >multiple tables). > > Not much to brag about :-) Dima
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: