Re: hardware performance and some more
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: hardware performance and some more |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F218504.3163.25E942@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: hardware performance and some more (Kasim Oztoprak <kasim@saglik.gov.tr>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 25 Jul 2003 at 16:38, Kasim Oztoprak wrote: > this is kind of directory assistance application. actually the select statements are not > very complex. the database contain 25 million subscriber records and the operators searches > for the subscriber numbers or addresses. there are not much update operations actually the > update ratio is approximately %0.1 . > > i will use at least 4 machines each having 4 cpu with the speed of 2.8 ghz xeon processors. > and suitable memory capacity with it. Are you going to duplicate the data? If you are going to have 3000 sql statements per second, I would suggest, 1. Get quad CPU. You probably need that horsepower 2. Use prepared statements and stored procedures to avoid parsing overhead. I doubt you would need cluster of machines though. If you run it thr. a pilot program, that would give you an idea whether or not you need a cluster.. Bye Shridhar -- Default, n.: The hardware's, of course.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: