Re: index / sequential scan problem

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Shridhar Daithankar
Тема
Re: index / sequential scan problem
Дата
Msg-id
3F16B712.19311.58D7530@localhost
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
index / sequential scan problem Fabian Kreitner <fabian.kreitner@ainea-ag.de>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Paul Thomas <paul@tmsl.demon.co.uk>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Fabian Kreitner <fabian.kreitner@ainea-ag.de>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Paul Thomas <paul@tmsl.demon.co.uk>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Fabian Kreitner <fabian.kreitner@ainea-ag.de>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Jord Tanner <jord@indygecko.com>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Paul Thomas <paul@tmsl.demon.co.uk>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: index / sequential scan problem "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Fabian Kreitner <fabian.kreitner@ainea-ag.de>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Fabian Kreitner <fabian.kreitner@ainea-ag.de>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Dennis Björklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: index / sequential scan problem "scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Dennis Björklund <db@zigo.dhs.org>
Re: index / sequential scan problem "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
Re: index / sequential scan problem Fabian Kreitner <fabian.kreitner@ainea-ag.de>
Re: index / sequential scan problem "Shridhar Daithankar" <shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in>
On 17 Jul 2003 at 11:01, Fabian Kreitner wrote:
> psql (PostgreSQL) 7.2.2
> 
> perg_1097=# VACUUM ANALYZE ;
> VACUUM
> perg_1097=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE    select  notiz_id, obj_id, obj_typ
> perg_1097-#     from    notiz_objekt a
> perg_1097-#     where not exists
> perg_1097-#     (
> perg_1097(#       select  1
> perg_1097(#       from    notiz_gelesen b
> perg_1097(#       where   ma_id  = 2001
> perg_1097(#       and     ma_pid = 1097
> perg_1097(#       and     a.notiz_id = b.notiz_id
> perg_1097(#     )
> perg_1097-# ;

For 31K records, seq. scan does not sound like a bad plan to me but anyway..

How about 

 where   ma_id  = 2001::integer
and     ma_pid = 1097::integer 

in above query?

Bye
 Shridhar

--
No one can guarantee the actions of another.		-- Spock, "Day of the Dove", 
stardate unknown

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Fabian Kreitner
Дата:
От: Paul Thomas
Дата:
FAQ