Re: PostgreSQL
От | Shridhar Daithankar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 3F02C27E.24153.45F6251@localhost обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | PostgreSQL ("Ulisses Ponticelli Giorgi" <ulisses@compus.com.br>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 26 Jun 2003 at 19:09, Ulisses Ponticelli Giorgi wrote: > 1) In my SQL Server database I have about 1,000 Stored > Procedures. In some cases, one SP calls another SP that calls another, > and so on. To do that, I use the EXEC command. I've read that PostgreSQL > only supports functions. Is there any kind of trick that I can use in > PostgreSQL to make easier the conversion of all my SPs? How could I do > this? I just can't get all my SPs and rewrite the code. I was under impression functions are stored procedures. I mean OK, if you write them in PL/PgSQL. Shouldn't be a problem barring syntax differences.. HTH Bye Shridhar -- Fun experiments: Get a can of shaving cream, throw it in a freezer for about a week. Then take it out, peel the metal off and put it where you want... bedroom, car, etc. As it thaws, it expands an unbelievable amount.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: