Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joe Conway
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support
Дата
Msg-id 3F00A629.8020905@joeconway.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> If only ANYELEMENT and not ANYARRAY appears in a function declaration,
> then it can stand for any type, because only rule 2 applies.  (The
> difference from ANY is that multiple occurences of ANYELEMENT are all
> constrained to stand for the same type.)

Hmmm, I don't remember that nuance, hence the code deficiency. I'm
should be able to finish up the plpgsql hash table stuff in the next
couple of hours, then I'll get back to thinking about this one. Do I
have until midnite PDT, or EDT?

Joe


В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Missing array support
Следующее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [JDBC] Allow setObject(x,y,Types.INTEGER) if y is Boolean &