Re: Missing array support

Tom Lane wrote:
> It's just a matter of staking out what's considered an implemented
> feature.  The ARRAY[] syntax is definitely in, so if it needs a few
> adjustments around the edges to make it more spec-compliant, no one
> will blink at doing that during beta.

OK, but some of what Peter requested were new features too.

> If I were you I'd file this on the to-fix-later list and concentrate
> on polymorphic aggregates during the next couple days.  If that's not
> done by Tuesday it will be a tough sell to put in during beta.

Agreed. I'm planning (in principle at least) concentrate on this stuff 
between now and Monday evening, and I'm taking Monday off work, so 
hopefully I can get a fair amount done.

Joe