Re: PlPython
| От | DeJuan Jackson |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PlPython |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3EFB3C12.7050802@speedfc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | PlPython (Kevin Jacobs <jacobs@penguin.theopalgroup.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
So, the issue is that rexec was supposed to be secure but it's not and has be removed from future versions. Kevin has replace the calls of rexec with a non-secure version (maybe 'exec'), therefore the calls to plpython would be inherently insecure in the first place, so we have to make it an untrusted language.
Correct?
Kevin Jacobs wrote:
Correct?
Kevin Jacobs wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, DeJuan Jackson wrote:Just wondering (I don't use or intend to use plpython), but why does it need to be marked untrusted is the rexec code has been corrected.No corrected -- removed. Rexec is and will likely remain broken for at least one more Python release. Thus, it was decided to remove all support for it in Python, and consequently from PlPython. -Kevin
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: