Re: PlPython

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От DeJuan Jackson
Тема Re: PlPython
Дата
Msg-id 3EFB3C12.7050802@speedfc.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на PlPython  (Kevin Jacobs <jacobs@penguin.theopalgroup.com>)
Список pgsql-general
So, the issue is that rexec was supposed to be secure but it's not and has be removed from future versions.  Kevin has replace the calls of rexec with a non-secure version (maybe 'exec'), therefore the calls to plpython would be inherently insecure in the first place, so we have to make it an untrusted language.

Correct?

Kevin Jacobs wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jun 2003, DeJuan Jackson wrote: 
Just wondering (I don't use or intend to use plpython), but why does it 
need to be marked untrusted is the rexec code has been corrected.   
No corrected -- removed.   Rexec is and will likely remain broken for at
least one more Python release.  Thus, it was decided to remove all support
for it in Python, and consequently from PlPython.

-Kevin
 

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ron Johnson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PlPython
Следующее
От: Mikhail Terekhov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PlPython