Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread
| От | Jan Wieck |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3EF6F0D8.9070408@Yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] interesting PHP/MySQL thread (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
> At 12:33 AM 6/23/2003 -0500, nolan@celery.tssi.com wrote:
>> >
>> > Oh, you mean like "SELECT * FROM table WHERE field ~* 'nolan';"?
>>
>>No, I mean as in "SELECT * FROM table WHERE field = 'nolan';"
>>
>>That will match values with any combination of upper and lower case
>>letters that fold to 'nolan': 'Nolan', 'NOLAN', etc.
>
> For me that's a matter of taste. I prefer to use = for case sensitive and
> lower(field)=lower('data') for case insensitive. I wonder if there is a
> difference between using lower vs upper for case insensitivity but I've
> never bothered to look deeply into it.
In some character sets there might be. The German sz-ligature for
example has no upper case equivalent, and in turkish the upper cases of
i and y with two dots are exchanged.
I prefer your example too and since we have functional indexes, it
doesn't affect performance at all.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: