Jason Tishler wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 04:54:21PM +0100, deststar wrote:
>
>>On cygwin sa_family_t was undeclared, adding the following line:
>>typedef unsigned short sa_family_t;
>>to both:
>>src/port/getaddrinfo.c
>>src/include/libpq/pqcomm.h
>
>
> Isn't the attached or fixing Cygwin itself a better approach?
>
>
Yes it does seem better, attached is a proposed patch to cygwin.h &
configure.in (incase cygwin gets it in future)
Have tested with make installcheck & it works fine.
If you see no problems I will sumit to patches
thanks,
- Stuart
*** src/include/port/cygwin.h.orig Thu May 22 18:20:28 2003
--- src/include/port/cygwin.h Tue Jun 17 22:31:04 2003
***************
*** 21,23 ****
--- 21,28 ----
#else
#define DLLIMPORT __declspec (dllimport)
#endif
+
+ #ifndef HAVE_SA_FAMILY_T
+ typedef unsigned short sa_family_t;
+ #endif
+
*** configure.in.orig Sun Jun 15 05:07:58 2003
--- configure.in Tue Jun 17 22:22:24 2003
***************
*** 855,860 ****
--- 855,866 ----
[$ac_includes_default
#include <netinet/in.h>])
+ AC_CHECK_TYPE(sa_family_t,
+ [AC_DEFINE(HAVE_SA_FAMILY_T,1,[Cygwin does not have sa_family_t defined so test])],
+ [],
+ [$ac_includes_default
+ #include <netinet/in.h>])
+
AC_CACHE_CHECK([for PS_STRINGS], [pgac_cv_var_PS_STRINGS],
[AC_TRY_LINK(
[#include <machine/vmparam.h>