Re: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Shridhar Daithankar
Тема Re: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning
Дата
Msg-id 3EE5B6C5.31892.7FE833A@localhost
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning  (Howard Oblowitz <HowardO@LEWIS-STORES.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On 9 Jun 2003 at 11:18, Howard Oblowitz wrote:
> > in postgresql.conf:
> >
> > shared_buffers = 117248 (shmmax / 2 / 1024 / 8 ) This I got from this
> > forum.
> >
> >
> > Does this sound right or am I totally out of bounds here? I have, as said
> > before done this on our dev macine ( a lot smaller machine ), but it would
> > be nice with some feedback ..

With that kind of RAM and that kind of shared buffers setting, you must set
effective OS cache size so that postgresql can calculate when to flush buffers.

While tuning database, it always help to pin down the target first and then try
to reach it. If you could let us know what performance you are expecting out of
this machine and for what kind of load in terms of concurrent users, database
size and usage pattern etc., that would help.

HTH

Bye
 Shridhar

--
QOTD:    "I'm just a boy named 'su'..."


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Howard Oblowitz
Дата:
Сообщение: FW: [ADMIN] Shared_buffers and kernel parameters, tuning
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hash or merge join instead of inner loop