Re: Broken RR?
| От | Mike Mascari |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Broken RR? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 3EDF0D51.7050904@mascari.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Broken RR? ("Rasmus Resen Amossen" <rresena@hotmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > Rasmus Resen Amossen wrote: > > >>Does Postgres garantee repeatable-read (RR) during transactions? And >>does it implement ARIES/KVL? >> >>If so, why is the following possible? >> >>T1: begin; >>T1: select * from table; >> (notice the row with id = X) >>T2: begin; >>T2: delete from table where id = X; >>T1: select * from table; >> (notice the row with id = X suddenly is gone) > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/view.php?version=7.3&idoc=0&file=transaction-iso.html#XACT-SERIALIZABLE Whoops. Sorry. I though this was confusion regarding phantom rowsand READ COMMITTED vs. SERIALIZABLE. Nevertheless, I cannot repeat the above... Mike Mascari mascarm@mascari.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: